Will we open our eyes to the past and its implications, or drown them out
by shouting?
*The campaign to "protect our [British] history," in other words, is about
protecting the past from historians — and protecting the present from
dangerous new ideas about how we got here. Because when an organisation
like the Guardian researches its own historical links to transatlantic
slavery — and then apologises and embarks on a substantial project of
restorative justice
— the newspaper is not primarily presenting a
different past, but its ambition for a different present.*
The article linked to just above displays symbolic bigotry by
capitalizing "black" but not "white". (To avoid endorsing bigotry,
capitalize both words or neither one.) I denounce bigotry, and
normally I will not link to articles that promote it. But I make
exceptions for some articles that I consider particularly important,
such as the one linked to above.