When I posted
that assault weapons should be banned because they fire
with higher muzzle velocities, and therefore the wounds they cause are
more grievous and more likely to be fatal, I misinterpreted the
article I was referring to. This was pointed out to me by a reader.
The comparison actually described by the surgeon was between
high-powered rifles and handguns. The point is that all high-powered
rifles produce wounds that are more harmful and more likely to kill,
than the wounds made by handguns. This means I need to change the
conclusions I drew.
My revised conclusion is that we should require high-powered rifles
owned by the public to be designed to hold a small number of rounds,
contained in a fixed part of the rifle rather than in a magazine that
can be quickly replaced.