Many schoolchildren in the US are being told by their schools to use mobile computers with proprietary software, and the machines typically give the children's personal data to some company (often Google or Apple).

If a school makes an account in a student's name with a company, it has already violated that student's privacy. If the account does not have the student's name or other personal details, sending it unencrypted information about the student's school work violates that student's privacy.

These mobile computers always run nonfree software. Parents shouldn't allow their young children to be given nonfree software by anyone.

I was surprised that the EFF legitimizes the term "the cloud", which is meant to cloud people's thinking about letting companies have their data and do things with it. There is no cloud, only computers belonging to various companies. The term "cloud" is intended to encourage people not to ask, "Which company is getting which data, what does it do with that data, and which country's jurisdiction is it under?" Please, EFF, stop encouraging this cloudy thinking.

People are looking for clever ways to express protest messages in Paris.

I suggest the way that the civil rights movement used: walk with a sign, chanting, and dare the authorities to interfere.

The TPP and TTIP, ostensibly meant to "liberalize trade" but designed mainly to give business more power, can sabotage efforts to avoid global heating disaster.

People are looking for clever ways to express protest messages in Paris.

I suggest the way that the civil rights movement used: walk with a sign, chanting, and dare the authorities to interfere.

ALEC, with the support of Ben Carson, continues to sabotage attempts to avoid global heating disaster.

ALEC has lost over a hundred sponsors, but it still gets plenty of money from the Koch brothers.