Pinochet's constitution for Chile imposed a laissez-mourir
"neoliberal" economy. The vote on the constitutional assembly
indicates repudiation of that ideology — an intention to allow the
government to limit the power of the rich and to actively help those
that need help.
It is ironic that some bemoaned the surprise that the explicit
requirement for 50% women in the assembly actually resulted in
slightly increasing the number of men in the assembly. Does this mean
they now reconsider whether it is right to have an explicit gender
requirement in public elections?
I also wonder what will happen, or perhaps what did happen, in the
encounter between such a requirement and transgender and
nonbinary gender.