PROJET AUTOBLOG


Richard Stallman's Political Notes

Site original : Richard Stallman's Political Notes

⇐ retour index

Nursing home fines

samedi 30 décembre 2017 à 01:00

US nursing homes asked the government to please stop fining them for mistreating patients. The saboteurs granted their wish.

Drilling in the Amazon

vendredi 29 décembre 2017 à 01:00

Oil drilling in the Peruvian Amazon has poisoned land and rivers. The indigenous people sometimes occupy and shut down oil facilities for days or months.

The local oil pollution might degrade or wash away in a couple of centuries, but the damage done by global heating is forever. The most important fight in the Peruvian Amazon is to prevent construction of new wells.

EU exit paradox

vendredi 29 décembre 2017 à 01:00

Most of Labour's supporters want Britain to stay in the EU. The party is vulnerable to competition from a party that would support this.

UK exit from the EU is a paradoxical issue. The EU requires every country to be part of several business-supremacy treaties, each of which cements the nondemocratic and therefore unjust power of business. The EU has plutocratic policies of its own in several areas including copyright, agriculture, and inequality of wealth. In principle, returning to freedom and democracy requires escaping from the EU.

However, the EU also regulates businesses and protects some human rights. Therefore, exit from the EU does not necessarily imply things will get better.

If the plan for Britain's economic policy after leaving the EU is to sign a bunch of business-supremacy treaties, the effect will be to make things even worse.

University speech

vendredi 29 décembre 2017 à 01:00

The troll is not the only one in America trying to restrict what people can say. Many universities do it, too.

'Inappropriate' behavior

vendredi 29 décembre 2017 à 01:00

Men now face being fired for vaguely sexual conversations that were not sexual harassment and that no one complained about.

Naturally, the announcement of dismissal used the vaguest possible word: "inappropriate". That word means "not correct in my judgment." Such a vague criticism can never justify the conclusion that someone has done wrong. Any act might be frowned upon by someone.

If you want to demand that someone be fired or prosecuted for some action, or justify firing the person for some action, it behooves you to make an accusation that is concrete, not vague like "inappropriate". You need to say what the action was, so we can judge how wrong it was. If you can't or won't describe it with something more concrete than "inappropriate", we must presume it wasn't bad enough to punish.

This note is not meant to defend conduct that merits some concrete criticism. Once there is a concrete criticism, we have a concrete issue to consider.