DeMentis claims that chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine have "linked themselves to HAMAS" and therefore are promoting terrorism. He said that this justifies prohibiting them.

If they have indeed done so, that conclusion could follow. They might also be committing a crime by supporting HAMAS. But do they really do that?

The quotations from Students for Justice in Palestine seem to be ambiguously on the borderline. The group called HAMAS's terrorist acts "part of the resistance", which asserts legitimacy for them. That is a moral reason to refuse to support that group.

But the information in this article does not show the group as saying it is is "part of HAMAS".

China repeatedly rams resupply ships sent by the Philippines to its base on Second Thomas Shoal, hoping to compel the Philippines to abandon that base.

A newly elected far-right German legislator turns out to be literally a Nazi, but hides it from all but close supporters.

The world has failed to act to keep global heating from exceeding 1.5°C. Now it is basically too late.

How did we miss our chance? Governments have fought determinedly to oppose all efforts to save the world as we know it. And they are still doing so.

*[London thug department] arrests more than 60 climate activists at Just Stop Oil protest.* Their nonviolent protest consisted of walking slowly.

*Finnish neo-Nazis used 3D printer to make guns in preparation for "race war".*

Home-made guns are now a serious danger. I think it is valid to criminalize possessing one.

However, the British approach of making it a crime to have a copy of plans for 3D-printing is an injustice.

To make the mere possession of a copy of something — whatever it might be — is an injustice because it puts everyone in danger of being set up for prosecution.