A lawsuit accused the developers of ChatGPT of "stealing" people's personal data to train the system.

The article does not say how the company obtained that data. Security measures should have prevented that — how come they did not? Is it possible that the company got permission to use that data from other companies that had collected it?

Using the data can be wrong, but the fundamental wrong is collecting it at all.

*"Resistance is possible": Ravish Kumar, the broadcaster risking his life to tell the truth about India today.*

(satire) *Human Rights Organization Accuses Ron [DeMentis] Of Subjecting Migrants To One Of His Speeches.*

*Texas [prisoners] deprived of water and AC are fainting in jails that reach [up to 116°F].*

Water is a necessity for human life. The prison thugs are putting the prisoners' life and health in danger.

*[British] Campaigners vow to step up action against new North Sea oilfield.* Ministers know that the world has no room for this, and they are disregarding climate commitments to approve it.

This is plutocracy at work.