Moderna patented a short subsequence of a natural human gene.
Natural genes are not supposed to be patented, but patenting a
subsequence of one is basically equivalent and should not be allowed
either.
This was noticed because it turns out that SARS-CoV-2 contains that
same sequence. How did that happen? It could be the result if
genetic engineering, if anyone did that; but it is no proof that the
virus was engineered, because it could have randomly incorporated that
sequence as RNA while adapting to a human host.
The article is slanted in support of the lab leak theory, and it's not
impossible, but not proven either. If it is some day established that
a lab leak played a role, we could learn important precautions to take
in genetic engineering of viruses. However, even if the virus did not
pass through a lab, we might nonetheless learn some important
precautions.
(satire) Either way, Moderna's patent lawyers will sue the virus,
and it won't dare reproduce any more in countries with vigorous
patent enforcement. Then WIPO will tout this as proof that patenting
of gene sequences is vitally important for everyone.