The US cannot assure Britain that that the First Amendment will apply to Julian Assange outside
the US, because an old Supreme Court decision says it does not. This probably means that
Assange's last appeal will proceed, and go on for a long time during the US election campaign.
The article contends that Biden's interest, as well as justice, argues for
dropping the charges
against Assange.
- To ask (even rhetorically) whether Assange has been "punished enough" is to normalize
horrible abuse. The conditions that Assange has suffered in Belmarsh prison are too cruel even
for the worst criminals. No one should be
kept alone in a cell
for 23 hours a day.
- Giving Assange a plea bargain would be better than trying him as
a spy, but it is not enough for freedom of the press. The US should
drop all the charges against Assange.
- The threat to the freedom of national security journalism in the US is a direct
consequence of the Espionage Act. As long as it stands in its current form, it will tempt
prosecutors and their superiors to prosecute journalists. We can struggle to keep the
government resisting that temptation, but what we really need is to add a public interest
defense to the Espionage
The concept of spying means reporting secretly to some entity. Public reporting about state
crimes that Americans have a right and a duty to consider in their political
activities is not legitimately considered spying.