The president of Tunisia has used constitutional emergency powers
to take drastic actions: dismissing all the ministers and canceling
the immunity of members of parliament.
That last is in effect a threat to prosecute them.
Opponents argue he has not properly followed the constitution.
His supporters rallied on the streets in large numbers,
and so did his opponents. But then he prohibited rallies entirely.
I don't know enough to judge the right or wrong of these actions, but
I think there is enough information to see who the real evildoers are:
the IMF, which demands to increase the price of bread while many
Tunisians fear having no food.
Perhaps there is a more efficient way to make sure that the poor have
bread, rather than a general subsidy for bread. Would the IMF permit
establishment of an alternative support for the poor?