A UK politician has been forced to resign from some positions because
his
swiped credit card number was used to buy pornography depicting
children. The fact that it wasn't him is, apparently, not
sufficient to protect him; being falsely accused is considered reason
why he must resign.
Isn't this nuts?
These events illustrate that the crusade against "child pornography"
endangers everyone. This result tends to happen whenever possession
or purchase of some sort of publication is illegal. We must abolish
such laws because they whip up witch-hunts.