The CDC ordered a ban on evictions until Dec 31, but the wrecker is reinterpreting it so as to help landlords chase people out sooner.

This is not necessarily motivated by a desire to kick people when they are down. Its motive might instead be to increase the spread of Covid-19; we know he wants to do that.

*China ambassador makes veiled threat to Hong Kong-based Canadians.*

This confirms that China is intentionally using visitors as hostages.

*"Do we not see the ascent of control over compassion, security over support, capital over care, and war over welfare?"*

Demand for efficiency has "crushed the humanity" out of the activity and profession of taking care of someone else.

I have a feeling that the use of "to care" to mean an action rather than an attitude is part of that change.

Various lasting debilities affect around 2% of the people who get Covid-19.

It follows that if we let the virus run rampant through the US and infect around 70% of the population, so that herd immunity stops it, we will have about 5 million newly disabled Americans. That's in addition to the 2 million or so who would die.

That's what the wrecker is now in favor of.

It could be more than 5 million.

Given the possibility of being infected twice, once with each of the two principal strains of the virus, it's conceivable that each one would spread until 70% of Americans have had it. So we might end up with a 10 million newly disabled Americans.

In the identified cases of reinfection, the second infection was more grave. Perhaps that is a real phenomenon. Or perhaps it is an artifact of the way this is studied: I suspect the analysis to detect reinfection is done only on patients that need to be hospitalized.

The push to let the virus run rampant is a fake scientific controversy bankrolled by rich people.

Thus it is comparable to the planet roaster's campaign to generate fake controversy about human-caused global heating, and fake doubt about whether tobacco kills.