Technology for deducing thoughts from observations of the brain is
still in its infancy, but it is
not
too early to discuss legal limits for it.
The right number 1 in this article, "to freely decide you want to use
a given neurotechnology or to refuse it," is obviously insufficient.
You have the right to decide whether an insurance company can track
your car's movements with a GPS box, but many people can't afford the
extra cost of insurance without tracking. You have the right to work
without a LinkedIn account, but many jobs will pass you by if you
don't.
We need a stronger version of that right, one which will stop
anyone from pressuring you to say yes.