A commander in the London thug department, who drew up the policy for repression of drugs, faces dismissal for taking marijuana and two psychedelic drugs while on vacation outside the UK.

When a person's conduct conflicts with a rule, at least one has to be wrong. When the person has publicly defended the rule, at least one aspect of per conduct must be wrong. But which one?

Don't assume blindly that it was right to repress drugs and wrong to try them. These drugs are not addictive and there should be lawful ways to get them and try them. I think the commander's wrong was to participate actively in repression of these drugs.

A nexus of trumpery is a connection between Covid-19 disinformation, profit from ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and the wrecker's claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

Cambodia plans to extend total repression of opposition views onto the internet by centralizing network commuication.

China is not the only country to have done this -- Russia has done it too.

(satire) *Artificially Intelligent Amazon Supercomputer Stuck In Dead-End Retail Job.*

*We Need Answers About the Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance of the CIA.* And Congress must put an end to it.

Sad to say, Congress is rushing to do the exact opposite, with the "EARN It" act that would prohibit services from offering end-to-end encryption.