When plutocratist Democrats defeat progressive programs, the next thing they do is pretend that the programs failed because they went "too far left." This is supposed to be a reason to vote for plutocratist Democrats. Polls show that large majorities of Americans support the main progressive policy programs.

Now they are pushing for Clinton to run again for president.

I will back Sanders if he runs.

*Report Debunks Manchin's Inflation Argument Against Build Back Better.*

Here's an article that tries to convince us that what's really bad about global heating is that it treats disprivileged groups worse than privileged groups.

Sure, unfairness is wrong. But if most people in every group are going to be killed -- plus over half the other living species -- isn't that much worse?

If, in that killing of billions, an equal fraction were going to be killed in every ethnic or racial group, that would not make it ok.

NYC's new mayor, in regard to the recent fire, downplays the owner's failure to maintain and operate the building safely, and focuses on the tenants' dangerous methods for coping with those flaws.

It's generally better to fix the system than to try to teach many individuals to work perfectly within the existing flawed system. At one level, that's the reason to require central heating. At another, that's the reason for building codes. At another, that's the reason for progressive politics.

*What would the Supreme Court's "originalists" think of the filibuster?
If they were honest, they'd find it unconstitutional.*