Progressive Insurance misleads people about
what
it can do with the data it gets from its in-car tracking device, and
the data might cost drivers dearly.
Some of the arguments in the article seem mistaken to me. Even though
"telematics devices" commonly include GPS, it doesn't follow that
everything which is called a "telematics device" has a GPS. The fact
that the patent cites the possibility of a GPS also doesn't imply this
device has one. Perhaps the company is telling the truth when it says
there is no GPS in the device.
But it's a fact that cell phones are tracked all the time by
triangulation even without GPS. Sending reports in real time by a
cell phone connection makes this device an injustice; that practice
ought to be illegal. The data should be saved in the device, which
the driver would hand in from time to time.
I refuse to carry a tracking device on my person, and I would not
allow one in my car either.
In addition, the device should not record any data except the data
that are supposed to be used. If it is meant to check for certain
risky driving practices, it should only record those. For instance,
if the issue is accelerating very rapidly or braking hard, it should
record instances of those, but should not record acceleration or
breaking when they are not excessive — or the speed.
With these changes, the device would be acceptable.