In principle, making cars detect a drunk driver and refuse to start is legitimate in my opinion. However, it is unjust for the car to record data about these events.

If the car gets it, insurance companies will get it.

A medical patients' interest group is campaigning against three congresscritters that voted to keep Medicare drug prices high.

Progressives in Congress have launched a bill to require US banks to phase out lending to fossil fuel companies.

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights calls for suspending the sale of dangerous AI technologies.

(This means those whose use would imperil human rights.)

I don't believe that any kind of usage limits could prevent face recognition from endangering human rights.

*Google workers demand back pay for temps company underpaid for years.*

They are doing the right thing, standing up for better treatment of other workers.

However, the wording of their petition was careless. It calls for paying the unjustly withheld pay to all the temps "who were knowingly underpaid by Google." That means, all those who knew they were being underpaid. But I suspect that none of then knew it, at that time.

I think the employees meant to say, those "that Google knowingly underpaid."