Various countries have accused China of utilizing a bug in nonfree
software, specifically Microsoft Exchange, to spy on email of many
companies and organizations.
The problem with these accusations is that they don't show us the
reported proof, so we can only take the claim on faith (or not). I
see no reason to doubt that China would engage in such digital spying,
nor the US, the UK, or Australia.
The article spreads confusion by referring to "intellectual property."
From the context, I know it must refer to trade secrets, because
nothing else makes sense — but most people don't know that it can't
refer to copyrights, patents, trademarks, geographical product names,
or any others of the long list of disparate laws that the term refers
to. Most people confuse these things with each other, and
"intellectual property" encourages that confusion.
Please join me in shunning that term.