Trump said, though not in so many words, that people like him should be blocked from becoming US citizens.

The US already has a very basic ideological test for those who wish to be citizens. The test seems legitimate to me. There is no reason to welcome an immigrant that isn't well-disposed towards the US constitution and domestic peace. But note that Communist parties nowadays do not necessarily advocate setting up a Communist dictatorship. I think that membership in many of them is entirely consistent with support for the US Constitution.

I've suggested that would-be immigrants be required to make a public statement of support for certain human rights, including religious freedom, as a visible rejection of the influences in their previous country that might pressure them to oppose those human rights.

Treating women as sex objects interferes with their activities. Men too can be treated as sex objects, but it doesn't happen in a way that causes real problems for them.

The US is having record floods again, this time in Louisiana.

Global heating has made floods bigger and more common, and the problem will keep getting worse.

A methane leakage "hot spot" in New Mexico has been traced to natural gas extraction.

Clinton shows that a female candidate can be "just as Machiavellian, just as ruthless, just as hawkish, just as corporate and just as neoliberal as her male counterparts."