The state of Victoria (in Australia) wants to pass a law
to punish offending the sentiments of the public.
This is prima facie unjust.
When I look at the description of the actions of Richard Pusey,
presented as an example of what this bill aims to criminalize, I
simply cannot see what is supposed to call for punishment. Who did he
harm, and how? Nobody, as far as I can see. The article makes no
attempt to explain, and that's a sign that it may be wrong.
I wonder: if a reporter had been there, and filmed them instead of
Pusey, is that also intended to be criminalized? I have no idea.
The proposed law is so vague that no one could ever feel safe from
being prosecuted under it. People could literally be tried in
Twitter, as public opinion is shaped to take offense or not.