We get it: people like technology that they believe is easy to use,
and costly, flashy-looking smartphones have become status symbols for
many. The trouble is that the cost of owning an iPhone is even higher than the
new iPhone's hefty $1000 USD price tag.
Here are four reasons to avoid the new iPhone (and all things iOS):
The iPhone despises free software
While Apple is happy to make use of free software to construct its
operating system, almost all of the software distributed with its
devices is proprietary. Apple's refusal to release its source code
violates your freedom to study, modify, and distribute software. Apple
may claim to care about your privacy and security, but unless you can
inspect Apple's source code, you have no way of verifying whether
they're really looking out for you. And unless you have the right
to install third-party or modified versions of the software on your
device, you have no way to protect yourself when they aren't.
Apple loves DRM
Apple products, including the iPhone, are shackled with Digital
Restrictions Management (DRM). Despite the fact that DRM restricts
your freedom, preventing you from using computers as you please, Apple
works hard to restrict you, even going so far as to argue that the
anti-circumvention provisions of the U.S. Digital Millennium
Copyright Act, which makes it illegal to tinker with an iPhone for any
reason, should remain in place. Even Steve Jobs's opportunistic 2007
essay arguing against DRM has mysteriouly disappeared from Apple's Web
site. They have a history of using demonization, concern trolling,
and false claims about security to justify this.
Apple is lawsuit-happy -- especially regarding software patents
Apple has often ended up embroiled in lawsuits, both as plaintiff and
defendant, and has several times unleashed their massive legal team on
other smartphone creators, including suing HTC for allegedly
infringing on multiple software patents relating to the iPhone in
2010, and spending the last six years battling Samsung in
massive litigation encompassing more than 50 lawsuits worldwide
covering a variety of alleged violations, including that of some Apple
software patents. Some of these cases drag on today.
We've written extensively about how these lawsuits could hurt free
software, causing free software developers to shy away from any
ideas that might expose them to a patent infringement lawsuit. The FSF advocates for the elimination of all software
patents.
Apple has worked hard to take away their customers' right to repair
Many people like to tinker with things they own, to understand how
they work, modify them in ways that make them more useful, or to
extend their usefulness through repair. Though the four freedoms
of free software do not encompass hardware, restriction of the right
to repair often goes hand in hand with nonfree code, and Apple is a
prime example.
Apple leads the charge among technology companies when it comes to
removing your right to repair, through physical changes to their
products and by lobbying for laws that make it illegal for you to
modify devices that you own. Apple's physical changes include using
non-standard screws and tools for their products, making it extremely
difficult to open them up to examine, repair, or replace parts. Its
legal efforts include attempting to kill a "Fair Repair" bill
introduced by farmers and independent repair shops in Nebraska earlier
this year. These measures by Apple negatively impact free software
developers trying to reverse engineer support, or make modifications to
the hardware that would allow free software to run on the devices.
Apple's encryption is not trustworthy
In 2016, the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
tried to force Apple to help it unlock an iPhone 5c used by a
person believed to have staged a terrorist attack in
California. While it is good that Apple did not create a wide
open general backdoor for the FBI which could've been exploited
by others and for other purposes, they still conceal their
encryption practices, so users cannot discern what's happening
under the glass or verify Apple's claims.
Part of Apple's security efforts include preventing unauthorized
firmware from being installed on a device by verifying that all
firmware updates are signed with a trusted key -- but the trusted key
is Apple's, not yours. That means Apple is ultimately deciding what is
"authorized" firmware -- you cannot. True security in the long term
comes only from completely free software, and as security developer
Matthew Garret argues, "If Apple genuinely value user privacy
over Apple's control of a device" they should "allow users to remove
Apple's validation keys and substitute their own."
What can you do instead?
We don't have a freedom-respecting drop-in replacement for the
iPhone. Apple's government-subsidized DRM and massive legal
intimidation team make developing and distributing a freedom-respecting smartphone very
difficult. But we are nonetheless getting closer. You can have a
solid, basic smartphone today by running Replicant, a free
software version of Android. You can install it yourself on supported
models, or buy one pre-installed from Technoethical. You can
give the Replicant project a boost, and help them to implement missing
features, by donating. Also, check out F-Droid, an app
repository of exclusively free software for Android.
Keep an eye on the Purism phone crowdfunding campaign -- they
haven't yet fully committed, but they are trying very hard to provide
a phone whose hardware does not require any proprietary software, and
won't be locked down. If they do make such an announcement, you should
support them as much as you can.
Don't buy any iOS device, and let Tim Cook at Apple know why you
won't.