PROJET AUTOBLOG


Onahole Review

Archivé

source: Onahole Review

⇐ retour index

Ju-C

samedi 2 février 2013 à 23:58

Outvision. Red (1) is hard, blue (2) is soft. Let’s take a look at the soft version.

Lots of details.

1_1335334637_m_t38xu

To note since it’s kinda rare: plastic box. What’s written on it in english ? “Feel good. Feels right. Ju-C not only feels great, it’s well-made, durable, functional and it feels right with new and experienced users alike. With Ju-C we strive to satisfy and not dissapoint” (I didn’t add any new typo, that’s “as is”). And oh ! An URL.

Oh my fucking god, since when do they hire elite webdevs to create mini-sites like this ?! Damn it even a Twitter account and Youtube account it has. Even worse: instructions for banner adding. No kidding.

300_60

(but still no RSS feed, haha)

Ok, I just post the videos.

NLS opens and cuts.

1_1335334638_4_NXTVV1_1335335888_6_HYx9I

You guess this kind of structure doesn’t make it lifelike (and the outside neither), and I think that like TENGA toys, that’s not really the goal. Letting it warm up in hot water is a good idea, and the bigger bottom provides very good suction effect. Counterpart: that doesn’t make it totally quiet. I can’t confirm but from the structure, the hard edition should feel like the TENGA Deepthroat/SoftTube.

Easy to insert, mildly tight, the double layer makes it a bit harder to flip inside out for cleaning but cleaning is efficient, and the size should be ok for most people (I have to pull down to the testicles to feel the bottom, therefor just the right stroking size for me). Structure-wise similar to TENGA SoftTube, as said, but here the form and elasticity allows better squeezing. Overall an onahole you would choose for a long play (like I did this morning ^^).


Ju-C
, by AkaiHebi
0.77 Feeling and pleasure
0.68 Materials and cleaning
0.6 Packaging and addons
0.5 Price
Overall: 76 %
Not bad, not bad at all.. but a bit expensive ?