The EFF reports that HTTPS is making it difficult for states to impose selective censorship via filtering, which leads states to turn to demanding that companies such as Facebook carry out the censorship for them.

Unfortunately, it ends with an inadequate recommendation for companies to be "transparent" about their censorship. That's hardly enough to qualify as trying to resist.

The article also uses the term "content" to refer to publications, which ought to be avoided since it deprecates them all.