What the bully wants to impose is not a "new world order" but a return to the same old imperialist international chaos.
One point in the article is a conceptual confusion:
Yet
this is not an administration that wants to colonize; instead it
demands compliance. The new bosses in Venezuela are the same old
bosses, the same henchmen and yes-men, only now with the No 2 running
the show. This isn’t “imperialism”, not a new US protectorate nor some
southern principality for son-in-law Jared, but something much cheaper
and less onerous to the Oval Office: rule by remote control.
That statement adopts too narrow a definition of "imperialism".
US imperialism in the 20th century often operated by working with
local strongmen who were, in all but name, vassal rulers.
It was different from the kind of imperialism practiced by
European countries before 1950, but they often switched over to this new kind
with the colonies that they had given independence to.